Ballon dOr has been decided by one point twice – including with Man Utd legend
'It's not like one vote will ever make a difference', well tell that to Eusebio and Ronaldo (the Brazilian one, that is).
Both men missed out on winning the Ballon d'Or, football's most prestigious individual award, by a single vote, with Eusebio getting pipped by Manchester United legend Bobby Charlton in 1966, and Ronaldo losing out to Germany midfielder Matthias Sammer in 1996.
To be fair, in both cases there weren't all that many votes cast. Back in the day, a carefully selected panel of sports journalists would decide the winner, meaning that players were often separated by small amount of votes, whereas nowadays nearly three thousand are handed out, with players and international coaches joining the party.
READ MORE: 8 players who finished second in Ballon d'Or – but never won the coveted best player prize
Charlton was crowned world player of the year after inspiring England to victory at the 1966 World Cup, earning 81 votes to see off the challenge of Portugal superstar Eusebio, who earned just one vote less.
Thirty years later, the award was decided by the same margin, with Sammer, who had led Germany to glory at Euro 96 that year, receiving 144 votes to pip Ronaldo on 143.
Would you make any changes to Ballon d'Or voting system? If so, let us know in the comments section below.
By contrast, when Lionel Messi narrowly beat Virgil van Dijk to the award in 2019, he received a whopping 686 votes, with the Liverpool defender earning 679.
There's no need to feel too sorry for Ronaldo or Eusebio though as both players ended up getting their hands on the big golden ball before retiring. Eusebio won the title in 1965 off the back of a remarkable scoring season with Benfica, while Ronaldo was crowned in 1997 and again in 2002.
READ NEXT:
People are only just realising what Ballon d'Or actually means
Next 10 Ballon d'Or winners predicted by Football Manager
Ronaldo gets his lowest Ballon d'Or ranking and is behind Man Utd team-mate
Source: Read Full Article